Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:43
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Nintendo Switch update 20.1.1 out now, patch notes - Nintendo Everything
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Is a light therapy mask a good investment?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
ESA supports Moon mission carrying first European rover - European Space Agency
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Do all rocket engines emit harmful gases into the atmosphere during launch?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Target and Walmart tariff price hikes leak online from an unlikely source - Mashable
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Our sister died because of our mum's cancer conspiracy theories, say brothers - BBC
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?